I'm not one to worry about/read what the artists themselves have to "flawed" (opinion depending of course, Mr. ![]() *Also, a part of Lou's appeal IS that he and his music, etc, are Views it to be (reality is.that there isn't a concrete reality. ![]() *By the way, rock (along with anything/everything else in life) isn't 'Berlin'.you don't have to, though - in case you were not aware of Scantily written response to the original question: Search andĭestroy-Lou Reed (of course, I chose to focus my response on Now, it's only fair that YOU (sir) further elaborate on your VERY Same for side one (which is riddled with flaws, in my opinion). Which I (personally, of course) can not say the Two are expressed as well as I (the listener) could have hoped for since you're clearly one for games of silly semantics) after on side The expressions sought (or seemingly sought (seeing as everything has flaws, regardless of ones individualĭefinition, nothing is perfect - doesn't exist, not in my mindĪnyways) flawless manner. (record) the entire second side (other than the final track) in a near Would mean (to me, of course) the fact that Lou was able to put on wax What is a "flaw" to me may not be to youĪnyways, in this particular case (Lou Reed 'Berlin'): "near flawless" It short and sweet (as opposed to my near rants in previous posts).Īnyways, "near flawless" is to mean whatever it means to each andĮvery individual, obviously.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |